Nowadays profession of landscape architecture is an industry as many other profession is. Back yards, Open spaces, parks and even cities are design in short time by people who never were the site, and even might not know where it is... Design process goes through systematized processes.
In any scale, there is a fixed system in a design process more or less, and it largely determines its design. For example, I could even say that drawing plan is a part of system. It is a great system that neatly capture a site, and allow you to work efficiently on a desk. However, it also constraint the way you look at the site for some reasons including its two-dimensionality. Many designer must understand where the obvious mistake you found on the site came from, when they think about its drawing on a plan.
In larger scale like international project, a design has to get through more layer of media ( I consider plan, for example as a medium), often making designer more indirect to its site.
In the lecture 7, Thad from Edaw talked about the way they work world wide. what are the typical flow of design that Edaw apply, and how its process is allow them enhance and constraint their project? Also, what are ideal design process for international project?
Design Process
Working world wide in a large firm like Edaw always involves many different organizations, and requires to work efficiently in a group and with other groups. One has to respond various opinion from different people and adjust their way to direct their design.
He first mentioned about some basic process
Development plan ---- Documentation plan (1 surface treatment plan, 2 planting plan, 3 construction plan) and it requires a lot of interaction within these processes, such as client, developer, government, engineer, environmental surveyer etc.. depending on project.
I list what I though important from his lecture here.
+ Your design has to be open for discussion.
---It is not great idea trying to complete design by yourself. Better to bring the sketch with/on butter paper in earlier stage. I understand this very well, since i sometimes try to work on my design to make it look well before the design is fixed. I pretty much fixed my design by myself if I really like it, and bring it as if it is completed one. However, this probably reveal the idea that does not look for other's comment and do not accept. It is important not to push the individual ego in designing public space.
+Give best shot of your design in first stage.
--- It is good to start your idea in more idealistic way rather than compromise your design due to expected limit too much, such as budget, technical difficulties, workload etc. Off course, you have to consider these constraint; however, You have to push your design based on what you believe, and draw it back as it is necessary. For instance, you may wanna push ecological function though it has more initial cost.
+Bring them all.
---If you have more ideas or option in our design, you should test them out too. Rather than trying to make a hard decision by yourself, see how each option goes, and take it with you. your co-worker or client may have strong opinion, and also one option may turn out to be really solid idea through discussion. It may also make your final design convincing to client.
+Educate them.
--- You may sometimes have to strategic to push your ecological design, educating client for sustainability.
As you see these lists, his discussion was mainly about working with others.
Most importantly, He insisted on significance of face to face communication. However hard to actually talk face to face with client or collaborator due to international project, it is really significant to meet them, and have communication as much as possible. I really agree with this, and I actually realize the idea that Thad is emphasizing on it from his attitude towards other people.
I found issues of "locality" and " Cross-culture" as a keyword from his lecture.
These issues surrounding Globalization are already came up many times in my previous blog.
Back to my interest "learn from old", I found that its practice in Landscape architecture is strongly tied with Locality and Cross-cultural discipline.
I think it is important to look at historical/ traditional design at the site, since it carefully deal with its own environment. Since there wasnt high technology that forcibly resist its natural environment in the past, and its technology has been continued for long time till it established as a Traditional, the looking at traditional technique will help you find a clue of design. If you may see many of old technology in various places, you may find clue from other place that has same climate. Since you work with "Cross-culturally", you may find get familiar with the old technologies from various area too.
However, you never be able to apply that directly, without well considering "locality" such as environmental condition in the specific site that you have to design. Although the area you are working and the area that you find a interesting technology from are similar in one parameter, for example, annual rainfall, same technique does not work if their temperature are totally different etc... Failure some times may attributed to religious belief too.
Looking at the current progressive sustainable development in Middle East, I sometimes feel suspicious the gorgeous and futuristic design which perhaps came from nowhere for local people there.
http://www.fosterandpartners.com/News/291/Default.aspx
"The first project as a result of the Masdar Initiative is a new 6 million square meter sustainable development that uses the traditional planning principals of a walled city, together with existing technologies, to achieve a zero carbon and zero waste community."
As it is mentioned above, Foster was asked to traditional walled city by local commissioner for its master plan, it maybe possible to develop innovative sustainable city, fused with unique local character by taking a code of "walled city". It is a relatively good example, that local organization give framework for development to the international design firm. I guess it is hard to determine how much its frame work it should be tight, or flexible. If it is too abstract, its design came from again nowhere, but sounds like traditional by playing only on words. Also, it is worthwhile to look at how detail these framework are described. I mean not only large master planning level, but developing for one lot. This will be totally in subject of planning, but i understand that regulation/rule is indispensable to control development, once its policy are determined.
Back to the original point of "Working internationally/collaboratively" by Thad, again it is important to respond what you are asked for and be open for many different comment rather than create amazing stuff by yourself. I understand that we are not artist to create own work. We are landscape architect to design a filed for public and nature. Good design for public must be came up by designing with public. The process that involving others, and input others largely affects its result. There is not product. Finished design also process that public interact in their daily life and process to educate ecosystem.
I would like to look at the design which constantly affect public (sub)conscious for ecosystem as process.
Agriculture modifies land by interacting with nature within people's daily activity, poducing food. The landscape created for its function are closely linked to what I mentioned above.
Process. Product.
I will look at some example in next blog....